Q You are required to create and submit an 8 to 10 slide presentation on one of the following topics: • Incident Response and Disaster Recovery during and after a declared workplace violence event • The use of Social Media as the main source of Communication during a declared disaster You must take the concept of IR/BC/DR gleaned from this course and apply the basic principles as outlined in your textbook to effectively describe a viable plan-of-action with key components explicitly stated. For example, who and what threshold must be met to initiate a response,? Who is in charge? Under what circumstance will a CSIRT be deployed? Use graphics to illustrate and support your recommendations and approach. This is an individual assignment and as such, you will all have different perspectives on an approach. Therefore, it is critical to incorporate key components as presented in class. Your presentation should be no more than 10 slides in length with proper citations (APA) listed at the end of the presentation (i.e., last slide). Rubric Incident Response and Disaster Recovery Presentation Rubric Incident Response and Disaster Recovery Presentation Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation 25 to >22.75 pts EXCELLENT - Provides a well-thought out presentation reflective of a complete understanding of assigned readings and how they apply to selected presentation topic. 22.75 to >20.5 pts GOOD - Provides thoughts and ideas gleaned from material presented in class in an orderly and clear fashion throughout presentation. 20.5 to >18.25 pts SATISFACTORY - Presentation flow consists of fragmented thoughts on topics and ideas presented in textbook. 18.25 to >16.0 pts EMERGING - Provides minimal information presentation. 16 to >0 pts UNSATISFACTORY - Does not submit individual project. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent of Presentation 25 to >22.75 pts Reveals a solid understanding of the topic selected. Thoughts are organized and expressed clearly. Uses examples to illustrate comprehension of material presented in chapter readings and how said material relates to selected presentation topic. 22.75 to >20.5 pts Presentation clearly conveys understanding of selected topic and how said topic applies to BC/DR. 20.5 to >18.25 pts Reveals a restricted understanding of the topic limited to information found in chapter summary. Has difficulty applying concepts in an orderly presentation. 18.25 to >16.0 pts Adds little to reveal comprehension of BC/DR concepts. 16 to >0 pts Does not add content to Presentation Project. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking evidenced by Presentation Content 25 to >22.75 pts Offers a critical analysis of readings, and discusses selected topic in an orderly and coherent fashion. Supplements analysis with real-world examples. Presentation incorporates research outside of assigned readings with citations made accordingly. 22.75 to >20.5 pts Presentation incorporates ideas discussed in text readings with examples related to real-world experiences. Presentation flows well and ideas are conveyed in clear manner. 20.5 to >18.25 pts Presents topics and ideas discussed in text readings, but only in summary format. Critical insight is not present in project. 18.25 to >16.0 pts Provides no evidence of knowledge of key BC/DR concepts and presenting them in project. 16 to >0 pts Does not submit Presentation. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style 25 to >22.75 pts Highly skilled presentation of ideas. Work exceeds expectations for this level of student. Absolutely no errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar noted. 22.75 to >20.5 pts Explicitly presents ideas. Work appropriate for this level of student. No spelling or grammar errors noted. A few minor punctuation errors identified. 20.5 to >18.25 pts Able to present ideas. Comes close to expectations for work at this level. Some punctuation and spelling errors but no errors in grammar identified. 18.25 to >16.0 pts Limited ability to convey ideas. Below expectations of work at this level. Errors noted in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. 16 to >0 pts Does not write Presentation. 25 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext You are required to create and submit an 8 to 10 slide presentation on one of the following topics: • Incident Response and Disaster Recovery during and after a declared workplace violence event • The use of Social Media as the main source of Communication during a declared disaster You must take the concept of IR/BC/DR gleaned from this course and apply the basic principles as outlined in your textbook to effectively describe a viable plan-of-action with key components explicitly stated. For example, who and what threshold must be met to initiate a response,? Who is in charge? Under what circumstance will a CSIRT be deployed? Use graphics to illustrate and support your recommendations and approach. This is an individual assignment and as such, you will all have different perspectives on an approach. Therefore, it is critical to incorporate key components as presented in class. Your presentation should be no more than 10 slides in length with proper citations (APA) listed at the end of the presentation (i.e., last slide). Rubric Incident Response and Disaster Recovery Presentation Rubric Incident Response and Disaster Recovery Presentation Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation 25 to >22.75 pts EXCELLENT - Provides a well-thought out presentation reflective of a complete understanding of assigned readings and how they apply to selected presentation topic. 22.75 to >20.5 pts GOOD - Provides thoughts and ideas gleaned from material presented in class in an orderly and clear fashion throughout presentation. 20.5 to >18.25 pts SATISFACTORY - Presentation flow consists of fragmented thoughts on topics and ideas presented in textbook. 18.25 to >16.0 pts EMERGING - Provides minimal information presentation. 16 to >0 pts UNSATISFACTORY - Does not submit individual project. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent of Presentation 25 to >22.75 pts Reveals a solid understanding of the topic selected. Thoughts are organized and expressed clearly. Uses examples to illustrate comprehension of material presented in chapter readings and how said material relates to selected presentation topic. 22.75 to >20.5 pts Presentation clearly conveys understanding of selected topic and how said topic applies to BC/DR. 20.5 to >18.25 pts Reveals a restricted understanding of the topic limited to information found in chapter summary. Has difficulty applying concepts in an orderly presentation. 18.25 to >16.0 pts Adds little to reveal comprehension of BC/DR concepts. 16 to >0 pts Does not add content to Presentation Project. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking evidenced by Presentation Content 25 to >22.75 pts Offers a critical analysis of readings, and discusses selected topic in an orderly and coherent fashion. Supplements analysis with real-world examples. Presentation incorporates research outside of assigned readings with citations made accordingly. 22.75 to >20.5 pts Presentation incorporates ideas discussed in text readings with examples related to real-world experiences. Presentation flows well and ideas are conveyed in clear manner. 20.5 to >18.25 pts Presents topics and ideas discussed in text readings, but only in summary format. Critical insight is not present in project. 18.25 to >16.0 pts Provides no evidence of knowledge of key BC/DR concepts and presenting them in project. 16 to >0 pts Does not submit Presentation. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style 25 to >22.75 pts Highly skilled presentation of ideas. Work exceeds expectations for this level of student. Absolutely no errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar noted. 22.75 to >20.5 pts Explicitly presents ideas. Work appropriate for this level of student. No spelling or grammar errors noted. A few minor punctuation errors identified. 20.5 to >18.25 pts Able to present ideas. Comes close to expectations for work at this level. Some punctuation and spelling errors but no errors in grammar identified. 18.25 to >16.0 pts Limited ability to convey ideas. Below expectations of work at this level. Errors noted in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. 16 to >0 pts Does not write Presentation. 25 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext