Q Do you agree or disagree with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Berghuis v. Thompkins case (textbook, 157 - 159)? Is the majority or the dissenting opinion more convincing? Please explain.
The case of Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010), is a landmark decision case by the United States Supreme Court in which the court did take into consideration the location of the suspect which appreciates the parties individual rights to remain quiet under Miranda v. Arizona and are conscious of the fact that they have the right to maintain silence even though would not explicitly invoke or relinquish upon the rights. In context to the case, as of the textbook, the court finally declared that irrespective off and until the time, the suspect actually declares that they are depended on their individual rights their successive as well as intentional statements would likely be utilized by the court and also by the police officials may be o continue for communicating with them