Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Discussion Board Que...
Patricia seemed to be a strong woman who always had her husband by her side. Patricia was usually burdened with her duties towards her family, and her husband used to share those burdens. It was only...

Discussion Board Question 4
Discussion Board Question 4

Patricia seemed to be a strong woman who always ha

Logic Model_16327315...
The concerned logic model, while focuses at highlighting about the basic credentials of the program and the ways the program will be able to bring success, as in this case, the main component of progr...

Logic Model
Logic Model

The concerned logic model, while focuses at highli

Week 4 Discussion_16...
Topic 2: Given that the residents of the city of San Francisco considers themselves to be environmentally minded and "green", how does the resistance to the removal of the dam and the restoration of t...

Week 4 Discussion
Week 4 Discussion

Topic 2: Given that the residents of the city of S

Final Exam _ Critical Thinking

Final Exam _ Critical Thinking

Q QUESTION 1 1. William Doyle Testimony: A: Gathering and Weighing the Evidence: What facts and inferences does William Doyle make in his testimony? Are they relevant to the case? QUESTION 2 1. Defense lawyers and prosecutors cross-examine the witnesses in order to help determine the credibility of the witnesses and the accuracy of their testimony. B. Asking Important Questions: Imagine that you are the prosecutor. Ask Tom Randall one question and explain why your question is important. QUESTION 3 One of the important goals of critical thinking is developing beliefs about the world that are well-founded. Often this process involves analyzing and synthesizing a variety of accounts in an effort to determine "what really happened." Analyze and synthesize the testimony presented by the witnesses as you answer the question below. C. Constructing Knowledge: Do you believe that Mr. Randall was aware that Ms. Greene was intoxicated when she left his party? Do you believe he knew—or should have known—she would be driving home? Explain the reasons for your conclusion. QUESTION 4 Dr. Elizabeth Gonzalez (prosecution witness) Testimony: D: Evaluating Expert Testimony: Is the information provided by Dr. Gonzalez relevant to the guilt or innocence of Tom Randall? Why, or why not? QUESTION 5 1. Defense Summation: E: Evaluating Summation Accounts: Outline ONE key argument used in the defense's summation. What was the conclusion? Based on what reasons or premises?

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
I attended the party at Tom Randall's apartment on Halloween. I didn't actually receive an invitation—I came along with someone who did. I don't really know him that well. This was a pretty wild party. The place was jammed, and people were out of control! Dancing, drinking, laughing, singing—you know. Mr. Randall was making the rounds, making sure that everyone was having a good time, encouraging them to drink. I saw him talking to Kelly Greene on several occasions. He kept forcing her to drink, even though she didn't seem that willing.