Q By now, you should have a pretty good idea of what the research essay needs. But here's a recap of the most important requirements: • Present a persuasive thesis, which takes a stand on a particular issue and attempts to bring readers into agreement with that thesis. • Be in the range of 3000-3500 words. Must meet that minimum threshold to be considered successful. • Utilize at least 10 outside sources, of any type. Those sources should be high-quality and present the best information or opinions available on the matter at hand. At least one of those sources should adopt a viewpoint which is different from your thesis. • Include at least 2 visual elements: 1 chart/table/graph & 1 photo/image/drawing. Those visual elements should include captions as well as explanations in the essay of the text, and be properly cited. • Follow a clear structure designed to have the most positive impact on your thesis. • Follow MLA page formatting and citation guidelines (in-text and Works Cited). You have a lot of leeway for tailoring these essays to your individual subject matter's needs. The primary goal is to be persuasive, and whatever supports that goal is up to you. Documents submitted here MUST be submitted as a Google Doc with sharing and editing enabled. IF you are struggling with Google Docs, submitting your final essay within Canvas is acceptable. Be sure your group has reviewed your final draft. Rubric Final Research Essay Rubric Final Research Essay Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis & Evidence 25 pts Original, clear, focused, debatable well-supported thesis. Specific examples included for support. Uses targeted appeals to logic, emotion, and/or ethics as appropriate to be persuasive. 24 pts Original, debatable, sufficiently supported thesis. Examples included for support. Uses appeals to logic, emotion, and/or ethics as appropriate to be persuasive. 17 pts Identifiable main idea that is generally supported. Some examples included, though potentially vague or abstract. Uses some appeals to logic, emotion, and/or ethics to be persuasive, though perhaps not most appropriate for circumstances. 8 pts Identifiable main idea that is not well supported or does not match most of essay content. Some examples provided, but of a vague, abstract nature. Uses few to no appeals to logic, emotion, and/or ethics as appropriate to be persuasive. 0 pts Missing or unsupported thesis. Little to no examples for support. No appeals to logic, emotion, and/or ethics as appropriate to be persuasive. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 30 pts logical, coherent, unified organization with paragraphs used effectively and clear transitions. 27 pts coherent organization that might need some rearrangement or further paragraph division; effective transitions 17 pts generally organized essay flow but not all paragraphs centered around topic idea; some evidence of transitions 9 pts essay structure impedes effective communication of ideas; little evidence of transitions 0 pts little or no evidence of essay organization or development. No transitional elements used. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Skills 30 pts Balanced, authoritative sources; effectively integrated outside sources. It's evident that multiple sources were consulted in order to provide the highest-quality information to support thesis. 27 pts Effective, authoritative sources, sufficiently integrated into rest of essay. Evident that multiple sources were consulted in order to provide information to support thesis. 17 pts Some sources appropriately used for assignment; source content not well integrated into essay text. Not evident that multiple sources were consulted in addition to those which actually appear in the text. 9 pts Insufficient sources used for assignment and/or sources are of poor quality for academic purposes. Not well integrated into surrounding text. No evidence of research done beyond the quotes/paraphrases used in the body of the essay. 0 pts no sources used, or sources used inappropriately/unethically. (This will result in a 0 on the paper.) 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle, Editing & Proofreading 30 pts Strategically varied sentence structure. Vocabulary is tailored to writing context. No appreciable errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar. 27 pts Varied sentence structure. Vocabulary is appropriate to writing context. Minimal mechanical errors that do not interfere with reader’s understanding. 18 pts Some sentence variety. Basic vocabulary. Generally well-edited, with one or two consistent patterns of error. 9 pts Little variety in sentence structure. Basic or inappropriate vocabulary. Grammatical errors may interfere with readers’ understanding. 0 pts Little to no sentence variety. Frequently inappropriate vocabulary. Little evidence of proofreading; errors impede meaning. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudience Appropriateness 20 pts Arguments are tailored to meet the needs of the target audience. Counterarguments are anticipated and adequately responded to. Effective level of formality. 18 pts Arguments are well-founded, but may not fully consider the interests of the target audience. Counterarguments are anticipated. Appropriate level of formality. 11 pts Arguments don't consider the needs of the target audience. Counterarguments are not fully anticipated. Appropriate formality for writing context, though not always targeted to specific audience. 6 pts Arguments are not fully developed or fail to meet the needs of the target audience. Lack of appropriate formality. 0 pts Target audience not considered, and would not be affected by contents presented here. Too informal for context. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations & Formatting 20 pts In-text citations and Works Cited page follow MLA specifications consistently. Pages are formatted precisely using MLA standards. 19 pts In-text citations and Works Cited page follow MLA specifications, with some small but consistent errors. Pages are formatted using MLA standards. 12 pts In-text citations and Works Cited page generally follow MLA specifications, with some consistent errors. Pages are formatted using MLA standards, possibly with some error. 6 pts Is missing either in-text citation or Works Cited page, or citations do not follow MLA guidelines consistently. Page formatting does not follow MLA guidelines. 0 pts No documentation of sources included. (This will result in a 0 on the paper.) 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength 25 pts Essay meets or exceeds 3000 minimum words. 16 pts Essay close to meeting 3000 word requirement. 0 pts Essay significantly short of 3000 word requirement. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Requirements 20 pts Uses 10 or more high-quality sources to build essay content. Includes at least one chart/table/graph and at least one picture/drawing/cartoon. 13 pts Uses 8 sources, but does not include either a chart/table/graph or picture/drawing/cartoon. 7 pts Uses 5-6 sources to build essay content. Is missing one or more visual component. 0 pts Uses fewer than 5 sources, and might be missing one or both visual component(s). 20 pts Total Points: 200