Q Choose one of the following cultures to research their native diet and approach to health: Mexican, Indian, Japanese, Chinese, Haitian, Cape Verdean, Puerto Rican. Answer these questions. Please try to present your answers in an easy-to-read format. Your paper should be 1 page, single-spaced, use APA citation style references. 1. What are the typical foods eaten by people from these regions? 2. Provide a sample day (menu) of food typical for an adult male or female. 3. How (if at all) does this diet differ from a Western-style diet? 4. How does this culture view diet and health? 5. If presented with a patient from this culture who is in need of weight-loss counseling, what suggestions might you have for them given their cultural background (assume they still adhere to their native diet and cultural beliefs)? When you are ready to upload your assignment, select submit. Additionally, review this KB article on how to access the grading rubric and feedback. How do I view my grades and rubric feedback as a student in Canvas?Links to an external site. Rubric Cultural Diet Assignment Rubric Cultural Diet Assignment Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension 30 to >27.0 pts Develops a theme with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail 27 to >22.5 pts Develops a theme with a point of view or idea using adequate organization and detail 22.5 to >15.0 pts Develops a theme with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail 15 to >0 pts Does not develop a theme with an organized point of view or idea 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness 10 to >9.0 pts Completes the assignment on time 9 to >7.5 pts No Description 7.5 to >5.0 pts No Description 5 to >0 pts Missed deadline 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements 10 to >9.0 pts All parts of the case study were addressed 9 to >7.5 pts Less than 50% of the case study was addressed 7.5 to >5.0 pts Less than 25% of the case study was addressed 5 to >0 pts Less than 10% of the case study was addressed 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking 30 to >27.0 pts Responses exhibit exemplary evidence of critical thinking by using, as appropriate: Connections to relevant professional experience Relevant connections to the readings Accurate and appropriate vocabulary from current and previous weeks 27 to >22.5 pts Responses exhibit sufficient evidence of critical thinking by using some of the following: Connections to relevant professional experience Relevant connections to the readings Accurate and appropriate vocabulary from current and previous weeks 22.5 to >15.0 pts Responses show weak evidence of critical thinking by using some items poorly: Connections to relevant professional experience Relevant connections to the readings Accurate and appropriate vocabulary from current and previous weeks 15 to >0 pts Responses have no evidence of critical thinking: No connections to relevant professional experience No relevant connections to the readings Vocabulary is inaccurate or confusing and is not reflective of current or previous weeks 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting (mechanics) 10 to >9.0 pts Writing is easily understood, clear, and concise with no errors in grammar 9 to >7.5 pts Writing is easily understood with little to no errors in grammar 7.5 to >5.0 pts Writing is understandable, but exhibit multiple typos and errors in grammar 5 to >0 pts Writing is not understandable and contain significant typos 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParaphrasing and Citation 10 pts Approaching Standards 10 to >6.0 pts Above Standards Posts are paraphrased and cited correctly 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Standards 6 to >4.0 pts Approaching standards Paraphrasing and citation doesn't meet standards 8 to >0 pts Below Standards 4 to >0 pts Below Standards Paraphrasing and citation done incorrectly 10 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext