Q Richard Mason’s ethical framework for information technology is well known for the acronym PAPA which stands for PRIVACY, ACCESSIBILITY, PROPERTY, and ACCURACY. You are going to create a PowerPoint where you will analyze the four areas of ethics (PAPA) in relation to your life as a student and an information technology professional. Requirements: • You must create 12 PowerPoint slides. You can use the attached example PAPA PowerPoint as a template or make one of your own but make sure you include all the requirements. • Number your slides • The first slide will be your title slide.and this will be where you will introduce to Richard Mason's PAPA • The last will be your reference slide. APA format • You need 5 references (other than your text book)in APA format and at least two sources should be from a library resource subscription service from computer professional organizations (ex ACM, IEEE). You want articles that are peer reviewed. (Links to an external site.) When using the Wilmington University library databases be sure to look at Discovery How to guide (Links to an external site.) for help searching for peer reviewed articles. This page from The Owl (Links to an external site.)at the Purdue Writing Lab provides useful guidelines for evaluating sources. The Cornell library (Links to an external site.)provides literacy guidance in evaluating the credibility of web pages. • You must have one quote by Richard Mason from is 1986 original documentation. • Four slides defining each of the four areas of PAPA. • Five slides that demonstrate how PAPA relates to you as a student and IT professional citing specific examples from cases, laws, class discussions and current events. • The 11 th slide will be a conclusion or summary slide.The 12th slide will be your reference slide. Attachments • EXAMPLE PAPA PPT.pptx Download EXAMPLE PAPA PPT.pptx Rubric COT PHI 314 PAPA Rubric OA COT PHI 314 PAPA Rubric OA Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOT PHI 314 PAPA - Topic Coverage Topic Coverage (PAPA).Presented appropriate analysis and included content from readings, cases, laws, and class work threshold: 20.0 pts 25 pts Excellent (Extremely thorough coverage of all 4 topic areas. In-depth analysis. Exceptional amount of data from cases, laws, class work presented. Exceptional critical thinking skills.) 21.75 pts Good (Thorough coverage of most aspects of the topic. Ample amount of data used in presentation of analysis. Gives examples from cases, laws, class work. Clear evidence of critical thinking provided) 19.5 pts Proficient (Covers most aspects of the topic. Moderate amount of data presented as a foundation for analysis. Adequate analysis.) 17.25 pts Developing (Minimal coverage of topic with little analysis. Major aspects of topics were poorly addressed and used minimal data and examples.) 0 pts Incomplete (Scant or incomplete coverage of 4 topics with weak analysis. No use of data to support analysis.) 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOT PHI 314 PAPA - Ethics The 4 ethical elements of PAPA explained and related to academic, personal and/or professional experience threshold: 20.0 pts 25 pts Excellent (All the assignment criteria were followed.PAPA was defined and related to ethics. PAPA was related to the students academic, personal or professional experience.) 21.75 pts Good (Most of the assignment criteria were followed.Good understanding of the ethics of PAPA. PAPA was related to the students academic, personal or professional experience.) 19.5 pts Proficient (Moderate use of assignment criteria. Ethics of PAPA satisfactorily explained. Demonstrates some understanding of assignment as it relates to student's academic, personal and/or professional experience.) 17.25 pts Developing (Minimal use of assignment criteria. Ethics of PAPA poorly explained. Demonstrates little understanding of assignment. Barely related PAPA to academic, personal or professional experience.) 0 pts Incomplete (Assignment criteria not followed. Ethics of PAPA not explained. Did not relate PAPA to academic, personal or professional experience.) 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOT PHI 314 PAPA - Research Evaluation Evaluated the research. Good references in APA format listed. Research from a library subscription service (preferably from subscription service from a computer professional organization)and other sources generally accepted as legitimate and valid and peer reviewed threshold: 20.0 pts 25 pts Excellent (Highly effective evaluation of information and its sources. Fully considers the authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Uses multiple excellent sources from websites, technical sources and journals from computer. At least 5 excellent references in APA format. professional organizations or library resource subscription services.) 21.75 pts Good (Effective evaluation of information and its sources. Considers the authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Uses some good resources from websites, technical sources and journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services. Minor APA formatting errors.) 19.5 pts Proficient (Basic evaluation of information and its sources. Some consideration for authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Minimal amount of research from websites, technical sources and journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services. Some APA formatting errors.) 17.25 pts Developing (Ineffective evaluation of information and its sources. Minimal and/or incorrect consideration for authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Wikis or Blogs were used. No journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services. No APA format.) 0 pts Incomplete (No attempt is made to evaluate information and its sources. No sources listed or very poor research sources used. Journals not used.) 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOT PHI 314 PAPA - Writing Writing style was appropriate for work at this level. Spelling/grammar. PowerPoint requirements met. threshold: 20.0 pts 25 pts Excellent (Work exceeds expectations for this level of student. No errors found in spelling, punctuation or grammar.All PowerPoint requirements included.) 21.75 pts Good (Work appropriate for this level of student. A few minor errors found in spelling, punctuation or grammar. All PowerPoint requirements included.) 19.5 pts Proficient (Just meets expectations for work at this level. Some errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar identified. PowerPoint requirements missing.) 17.25 pts Developing (Below expectations for work at this level. Errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar. Some PowerPoint requirements missing.) 0 pts Incomplete (Far below expectations for work at this level. Excessive spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors. Many PowerPoint requirements not included) 25 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext