Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Week 2-Case Analysis 2

Week 2-Case Analysis 2

Q The purpose of this Case Study Analysis is to understand the fundamental elements and enforceability of online contracts. Instructions: Review Case #5.3 in your text. At the end of each case there are questions, for each question include: a. The general answer to the question b. Identify the relevant statutes/legal doctrines/Federal acts or laws that are demonstrated. *Note that these can be from this chapter or previous chapters* c. Fully define the relevant statutes/legal doctrines/Federal acts or laws that are demonstrated. d. Explain how they apply and what it means for future cases of a similar nature. Submission Instructions: • Submit your case as a WORD document in the drop box for that assignment. (Properly formatted in MLA) Grading Criteria: • Refer to the grading Rubric for case analyses for additional guidance. • Worth 2 Points Due Sunday by 11:59pm EST.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

1) Plaintiffs acknowledged in the joint status statement that they would arbitrate their claims collectively since doing so would not have been economically possible and because the arbitration forum required by the Agreement was "blatantly skewed" against consumers. Dell's request to halt the litigation and order arbitration was granted by the district court. The district court dismissed the case for failure to prosecute when the plaintiffs refused to follow the arbitration order. Because the arbitration forum required by the Agreement was "blatantly prejudiced" against consumers, the plaintiffs are appealing both the dismissal and the underlying arbitration order (Craig, 2013).