Q Please complete the following Critical Thinking Case Projects that align with this week’s TestOut.com Network Pro learning modules. Record your answers in a Word Document and submit it. 1. What is the strongest wireless encryption method? 2. How does a MAC access list help keep a network secure? 3. Which implementation automatically partitions a single broadcast domain into multiple VLANs? 4. How do you measure the signal strength at a given distance from the access point? 5. Which protocol is used to route frames back and forth between the wireless network and the wired LAN? 6. What is the difference between WPA Personal and WPA Enterprise? 7. How can geofencing protect your network? 8. Which default values should you always change on your wireless network? 9. Where is the best place to situate your wireless access point? 10. How many channels should separate two different wireless networks 11. Which types of wireless networks require line-of-sight connections? 12. How do range and antenna placement affect wireless networks? Rubric Critical Thinking Case Projects Critical Thinking Case Projects Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content 20 to >18.0 pts DISTINGUISHED Reveals a solid understanding of the proposed topic as evidenced by preliminary research and knowledge 18 to >16.0 pts PROFICIENT Identifies significant details of the proposed topic. Reveals an adequate understanding of the topic as evidenced by the amount of preliminary research. 16 to >14.0 pts SATISFACTORY Reveals a restricted understanding of the proposed topic. 14 to >12.0 pts EMERGING Adds little detail to describe the proposed topic 12 to >0 pts UNSATISFACTORY Does not identify the proposed topic. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization 20 to >18.0 pts Well developed paragraphs. Sequencing enhances ideas and meaning. Ideas focused on central theme. 18 to >16.0 pts Smooth transition between paragraph with adequate structure and sequencing of ideas. 16 to >14.0 pts Transition between most paragraphs with limited paragraph structure. Sequence is not logical. 14 to >12.0 pts Some transition with poor paragraph structure and some evidence of planning. 12 to >0 pts No transition between paragraphs, ideas not in logical order. No structure to paragraphs. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Development 20 to >18.0 pts Ideas focus on the central theme. All ideas are clearly presented and unified. 18 to >16.0 pts Central theme is matched to the topic, most ideas explore the central theme, clear and unified. 16 to >14.0 pts Ideas are clear. Some ideas address the central theme. Central theme is linked to the topic. 14 to >12.0 pts Few idea address central theme. Ideas ramble and are difficult to identify. 12 to >0 pts Does not follow the theme with muddles unclear ideas. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conventions 20 to >18.0 pts No errors noted 18 to >16.0 pts 1 error -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure 16 to >14.0 pts 2-3 errors -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure 14 to >12.0 pts 4-5 errors -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure 12 to >0 pts Multiple errors -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Style 20 to >18.0 pts No errors noted 18 to >16.0 pts 1 error -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format 16 to >14.0 pts 2-3 errors -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format 14 to >12.0 pts 4-5 errors -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general for 12 to >0 pts Writing is extremely unfocused. Several errors in: -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format rambling, or contains major errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; extremely disorganized. Does not use APA guidelines. 20 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext

View Related Questions