Q Each week, for your Data Management Project, there will be an assignment creating a deliverable for different components of a database you will design. This week describe the database you plan to design. Your paper should include the elements of the initial study phase as described in module 9 of the textbook as follows: • the problem a database is supposed to solve (or the reason for the database) • the constraints associated with the database project • the objectives you what to accomplish by designing a database • the scope of your database design project • the boundaries that describe what is and what is not included in your database pro-ject. Paragraphs in your paper must have at least three sentences: beginning, middle, and end. Make sure you cover all five topics listed above. Your paper should be in APA format (which means double-spaced and 12 pt. Times Roman font, with a separate title page) and should be 2 - 3 pages, not counting the title page. Since this is a database you are designing, references are not required, but can be included on a separate ref-erence page. Submit your assignment in MS Word format. Resources: • Textbook: Module 9 – Database Design • PowerPoint: Module 9 review charts Rubric Data Management Final Project Weekly Submission Rubric Data Management Final Project Weekly Submission Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Out-comeCritical Thinking 20 pts Main points are con-cise, clear and well developed. Evidence and detail provide superior support for the assignment. 18 pts Main points are clear and well de-veloped. Evidence and detail provide strong support for the assignment. 16 pts Main points are clear and devel-oped. Evidence and detail adequately support the as-signment. 14 pts Presents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified and demon-strates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Out-comeAnalysis 20 pts Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issues iden-tified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates complete command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diag-nosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective. 18 pts Makes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the strategic con-cepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates good command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools stud-ied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with rea-sons and evidence; presents a fairly bal-anced view; interpreta-tion is both reasonable and objective. 16 pts Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and con-cepts studied in the reading; Demon-strates limited com-mand of the strategic concepts and analyti-cal tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument. 14 pts Makes little or no connection between the is-sues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading. Supports diag-nosis and opin-ions with few reasons and little evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Out-comeKnowledge of Content 20 pts Exceeds require-ments in demonstrat-ing strong knowledge of con-tent and depth. 18 pts Knowledge of con-tent and depth are appropriately re-flected in the as-signment 16 pts Supplements case study with limited research into the present situation of the company; provides limited documentation of sources consulted. 14 pts Some knowledge of content and depth are evi-dent. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Out-comeAssign-ment Require-ments 20 pts Presents detailed, real-istic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the requirements for the weekly submission. 18 pts Work is accurately detailed. The week-ly assignment re-quirements are adequately ad-dressed. 16 pts Work reflects the assignment require-ments. The weekly assignment require-ments are somewhat addressed. 14 pts Work rarely reflects the assignment re-quirements. The weekly assignment requirements are rarely addressed. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Out-comeWriting Mechanics 20 pts Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correct-ness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; ex-tremely well-organized. 18 pts Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; in-cludes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized. 16 pts Knowledge of content and depth are satis-factory. 14 pts Writing is unfo-cused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks de-tail and relevant data and infor-mation. 20 pts Total Points: 100