Q Which theory of interpretation do you find the most persuasive, and why (make sure you answer the "why" part!)? Next, consider the following questions and explain how you think justices using each theory would answer the question. How would an originalist such as Justice Scalia approach the issue? How would an interpretivist such as Breyer approach the issue? (Breyer doesn't use the term, but "interpretivist" is the term we use in PoliSci speak to describe a theory of interpretation that sees the Constitution as a living document that should evolve with time). 1. Abortion: Can states restrict access to abortions? 2. Gun Control: Can states restrict gun ownership?
View Related Questions