Q Instructions In this assignment, you will calculate confidence intervals for the quantitative variables in the Heart Rate Dataset. Steps 1. Open the Heart Rate Dataset in Excel and identify the quantitative variables 2. Make sure the data is sorted by category (e.g.male-at-rest, female at-rest, etc.) 3. Use the Data Analysis tools of Excel to construct 95% and 99% confidence intervals for all 8 categories of the sorted quantitative variables. Excel will calculate the margin of error given as the “confidence interval” in the output. Use this margin of error to create your 8 confidence intervals by both adding and subtracting it from the sample mean (calculated in unit 3). This creates a range of values that is the confidence interval. 4. Create a Word document, and use your calculated results to explain what the confidence intervals tell us. What do these confidence intervals tell us about our heart rate data? How would you interpret the 95% and 99% intervals for resting heart rate? 5. Compare the 99% and 95% intervals and explain why one is larger than the other even though we use the same sample mean value. Additional Instructions: Your assignment should be typed into a Word or other word processing document, formatted in APA style. The assignments must include • Running head • A title page with o Assignment name o Your name o Professor’s name o Course Estimated time to complete: 3 hours Assignment Files Heart Rate Data Set [Excel Document] Rubric MA320 Unit 5 Assessment MA320 Unit 5 Assessment Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent MA320-CO2; MA320-CO3 25 pts Level 5 Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner. 22.5 pts Level 4 Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas. 20 pts Level 3 Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area. 17.5 pts Level 2 Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas. 15 pts Level 1 Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner. 0 pts Level 0 The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis 30 pts Level 5 Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation. 27.5 pts Level 4 Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation. 25 pts Level 3 Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation. 22.5 pts Level 2 Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation. 20 pts Level 1 Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation. 0 pts Level 0 The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology 10 pts Level 5 Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements. 9 pts Level 4 Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements. 8 pts Level 3 Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements. 6 pts Level 2 Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements. 4 pts Level 1 Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements. 0 pts Level 0 The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting 5 pts Level 5 The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. 4.5 pts Level 4 The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. 4 pts Level 3 The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication 3.5 pts Level 2 The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. 3 pts Level 1 The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. 0 pts Level 0 The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 5 pts Level 5 In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors. 4.5 pts Level 4 In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors. 4 pts Level 3 In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 - 4 minor APA errors. 3.5 pts Level 2 In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors. 3 pts Level 1 The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements 0 pts Level 0 There are no in-text citations AND/OR references. 5 pts Total Points: 75 PreviousNext