Q This is the form you'll use to evaluate yourself and your team members. 1. You will evaluate your teammates and assign up to 75 points. 2. I will calculate the average of scores assigned by the team. 3. The student will receive the average from his/her team plus up to 25 points for quality of individual work in completing the team member assessments for the rest of the team. 4. To earn the full 25 points, you must provide insightful and adquate comments about each team member to justify his/her scores. 5. Assigning a high number of points to each team-mate with short phrases such as "great teammate" or "always does his fair share" will not suffice. 75 points converted to ECU Grade Scale 75 100.0% A 74 98.7% A 73 97.3% A 72 96.0% A 71 94.7% A 70 93.3% A- 69 92.0% A- 68 90.7% A- 67 89.3% B+ 66 88.0% B+ 65 86.7% B+ 64 85.3% B 63 84.0% B 62 82.7% B- 61 81.3% B- 60 80.0% B- 59 78.7% C+ 58 77.3% C+ 57 76.0% C+ 56 74.7% C 55 73.3% C- 54 72.0% C- 53 70.7% C- 52 69.3% D+ 51 68.0% D+ 50 66.7% D+ 49 65.3% D 48 64.0% D 47 62.7% D- 46 61.3% D- 45 60.0% D- 44 58.7% F 43 57.3% F 42 56.0% F 41 54.7% F 40 53.3% F 39 52.0% F 38 50.7% F 37 49.3% F 36 48.0% F 35 46.7% F 34 45.3% F 33 44.0% F 32 42.7% F 31 41.3% F 30 40.0% F 29 38.7% F 28 37.3% F 27 36.0% F 26 34.7% F 25 33.3% F 24 32.0% F 23 30.7% F 22 29.3% F 21 28.0% F 20 26.7% F 19 25.3% F 18 24.0% F 17 22.7% F 16 21.3% F 15 20.0% F 14 18.7% F 13 17.3% F 12 16.0% F 11 14.7% F 10 13.3% F 9 12.0% F 8 10.7% F 7 9.3% F 6 8.0% F 5 6.7% F 4 5.3% F 3 4.0% F 2 2.7% F 1 1.3% F 0 0.0% F Teammate name: Comments on Individual Attributes: Contribution to team discussions & meetings 4.5 Chris was generally on time, mentally present, and involved in most of our meetings. There were a few times when Chris could have spoken up. Contribution to team Labs 2 Participated fully in only 1 of the labs; was missing from 2 labs; didn't help much on the other 2 Facilitated the contributions of others, shared control (did not dominate) 5 Chris was very good at encouraging others to practice leading and suggesting that others speak up Team Project Score 0-5 Overall assessment of effort and participation 5 Chris really embraced the project and put a great deal of time and energy into creating the deliverables Contribution of ideas/ helped solve problems 5 Chris was passionate about the project and was a source of great ideas during the entire process Contribution to developing project concept & goals 5 Chris led the charge in defining the project and setting our goals Contribution to planning process & monitoring progress 5 Chris was on top of the project and was excellent at communicating with the person assigned to complete tasks, ensuring that we finished on time Contribution to completion of Deliverables and Presentation 5 Chris went above and beyond to create the marketing component and to design the PowerPoint. Work Ethic Score 0-5 Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities 5 Not only would Chris complete his own work on time, he would gently encourage the rest of us to meet our deadlines Demonstrates leadership skills and abilities 5 Chris led by example, and was always the first to ask 'how can I help?' Demonstrates followership skills and abilities 4.5 When someone else was leading a meeting or in charge of a project component, Chris was a great follower Level of initiative when things needed to be done 5 Chris was always the first to take initiative to start our assignments and would jump in to help whenever anyone was having problems. Responsiveness to team communications outside of class 3.5 The main area where Chris needs to develop his team skills is in timely communications when he's not the one who initiates the communications. Level of commitment to the team & the work 5 Other than Labs, Chris was 100% on point with with team this semester. Total (75 points possible) 69.5 *Grade: 92.7% Overall Comments: Chris Jones PART 1: EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO WORK Use the following scale to rate the performance of the individual named above on a scale of 1-5 for each attribute. You MUST provide comments to justify scores in the spaces provided. EITHER for the individual attributes OR for the overall comments. I only require one or the other. You'll almost certainly earn more points with the individual attribute comments. Scores alone are not adequate. Team Assignments Score 0-5 Contribution to written assignments 5 Chris was highly engaged in the Team Charter, taking the initiative to start the document and editing the final version before submission NO Click on the tabs below to evaluate your teammates. YES *The score should align approximately with the descriptions on the right. IF YOU HAVE GIVEN A SCORE BELOW 75%, DID YOU/YOUR TEAM ADDRESS THE PROBLEM(S) WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL? PLEASE INDICATE BY HIGHLIGHTING THE APPROPRIATE CELL BELOW: KPI Attributes Below (1) Meets (2) Exceeds (3) Contributes to team meetings Proposes solutions to problems 3 Collaborates with Others 3 Listens to Others’ Ideas 3 Respects Other Members 3 Holds Others Accountable 3 Facilitates the contributions of team members Encourages open communication 3 Offers constructive input to refine ideas 3 Synthesizes Others’ Contributions 2 Actively seeks input from everyone 3 Individual contributions outside of team meetings Completes tasks 2 Delivers high quality work 3 Completes Tasks on Time 3 Assists Team Members 3 Shows Commitment to team excellence 3 Actively participates in group communications 2 Offers assistance without micromanaging or nagging 3 Fosters constructive team climate Communicates Politely and Respectfully 3 Has a Positive Attitude 3 Motivates Others 3 Demonstrates Humility and Trust in others 3 Offers Encouragement 3 Responds to conflict Promotes "Good Conflict" 3 PART 2: EVALUATION OF TEAMWORK, LEADERSHIP & INTERPERSONAL SKILLS Complete the following rubric by rating yourself for each KPI (key performance indicator) on a scale of 1-3. PLEASE BE HONEST. Offers alternative solutions or courses of action that build on the ideas of others. Helps the team move forward by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals. Helps move team forward by respectfully holding other team members accountable. Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others; notices when someone is not participating and invites him or her to engage. In addition to completing tasks in a thorough, comprehensive manner on deadline, proactively helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. Supports a constructive team climate. Respectfully shares ideas 3 Constructively Addresses Destructive Conflict 3 Manages/Resolves Conflict Effectively 3 Actively promotes “good conflict” whereby diverse ideas are respectfully shared & used to create better ideas. Addresses destructive conflict directly and constructively, helping to manage/resolve it in a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness and future effectiveness. Grading Guidelines: A = Great teammate. I would like to work with this person again. B = Good teammate. Performance not perfect, but no major issues. C = OK teammate. Did the bare minimum to get by most of the time. D = Difficult teammate. Minimal contributions to work and/ or significant interpersonal issues. Total 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 on a scale of 1-3. 3 3 3 Teammate name: Comments on Individual Attributes: Contribution to team discussions & meetings Contribution to team Labs Facilitated the contributions of others, shared control (did not dominate) Team Project Score 0-5 Overall assessment of effort and participation Contribution of ideas/ helped solve problems Contribution to developing project concept & goals Contribution to planning process & monitoring progress Contribution to completion of Deliverables and Presentation Work Ethic Score 0-5 Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities Demonstrates leadership skills and abilities Demonstrates followership skills and abilities Level of initiative when things needed to be done Responsiveness to team communications outside of class Level of commitment to the team & the work Total (75 points possible) 0 *Grade: 0.0% Overall Comments: Type Teammate Name Here PART 1: EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO WORK Use the following scale to rate the performance of the individual named above on a scale of 1-5 for each attribute. You MUST provide comments to justify scores in the spaces provided. EITHER for the individual attributes OR for the overall comments. I only require one or the other. You'll almost certainly earn more points with the individual attribute comments. Scores alone are not adequate. Team Assignments Score 0-5 Contribution to presentations & written assignments NO Click on the tabs below to evaluate your teammates. *The score should align approximately with the descriptions on the right. IF YOU HAVE GIVEN A SCORE BELOW 75%, DID YOU/YOUR TEAM ADDRESS THE PROBLEM(S) WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL? PLEASE INDICATE BY HIGHLIGHTING THE APPROPRIATE CELL BELOW: YES KPI Attributes Below (1) Meets (2) Exceeds (3) Contributes to team meetings Proposes solutions to problems Collaborates with Others Listens to Others’ Ideas Respects Other Members Holds Others Accountable Facilitates the contributions of team members Encourages open communication Offers constructive input to refine ideas Synthesizes Others’ Contributions Actively seeks input from everyone Individual contributions outside of team meetings Completes tasks Delivers high quality work Completes Tasks on Time Assists Team Members Shows Commitment to team excellence Actively participates in group communications Offers assistance without micromanaging or nagging Fosters constructive team climate Communicates Politely and Respectfully Has a Positive Attitude Motivates Others Demonstrates Humility and Trust in others Offers Encouragement Responds to conflict Promotes "Good Conflict" Respectfully shares ideas Constructively Addresses Destructive Conflict Manages/Resolves Conflict Effectively Supports a constructive team climate. Actively promotes “good conflict” whereby diverse ideas are respectfully shared & used to create better ideas. Addresses destructive conflict directly and constructively, helping to manage/resolve it in a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness and future effectiveness. In addition to completing tasks in a thorough, comprehensive manner on deadline, proactively helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. Offers alternative solutions or courses of action that build on the ideas of others. Helps the team move forward by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals. Helps move team forward by respectfully holding other team members accountable. Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others; notices when someone is not participating and invites him or her to engage. PART 2: EVALUATION OF TEAMWORK, LEADERSHIP & INTERPERSONAL SKILLS Complete the following rubric by rating yourself for each KPI (key performance indicator) on a scale of 1-3. PLEASE BE HONEST. Grading Guidelines: A = Great teammate. I would like to work with this person again. B = Good teammate. Performance not perfect, but no major issues. C = OK teammate. Did the bare minimum to get by most of the time. D = Difficult teammate. Minimal contributions to work and/ or significant interpersonal issues. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on a scale of 1-3. Teammate name: Comments on Individual Attributes: Contribution to team discussions & meetings Contribution to team Labs Facilitated the contributions of others, shared control (did not dominate) Team Project Score 1-5 Overall assessment of effort and participation Contribution of ideas/ helped solve problems Contribution to developing project concept & goals Contribution to planning process & monitoring progress Contribution to completion of Deliverables and Presentation Work Ethic Score 1-5 Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities Demonstrates leadership skills and abilities Demonstrates followership skills and abilities Level of initiative when things needed to be done Responsiveness to team communications outside of class Level of commitment to the team & the work Total (75 points possible) 0 *Grade: 0.0% Overall Comments: Type Teammate Name Here PART 1: EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO WORK Use the following scale to rate the performance of the individual named above on a scale of 1-5 for each attribute. You MUST provide comments to justify scores in the spaces provided. EITHER for the individual attributes OR for the overall comments. I only require one or the other. You'll almost certainly earn more points with the individual attribute comments. Scores alone are not adequate. Team Assignments Score 0-5 Contribution to presentations & written assignments NO Click on the tabs below to evaluate your teammates. *The score should align approximately with the descriptions on the right. IF YOU HAVE GIVEN A SCORE BELOW 75%, DID YOU/YOUR TEAM ADDRESS THE PROBLEM(S) WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL? PLEASE INDICATE BY HIGHLIGHTING THE APPROPRIATE CELL BELOW: YES KPI Attributes Below (1) Meets (2) Exceeds (3) Contributes to team meetings Proposes solutions to problems Collaborates with Others Listens to Others’ Ideas Respects Other Members Holds Others Accountable Facilitates the contributions of team members Encourages open communication Offers constructive input to refine ideas Synthesizes Others’ Contributions Actively seeks input from everyone Individual contributions outside of team meetings Completes tasks Delivers high quality work Completes Tasks on Time Assists Team Members Shows Commitment to team excellence Actively participates in group communications Offers assistance without micromanaging or nagging Fosters constructive team climate Communicates Politely and Respectfully Has a Positive Attitude Motivates Others Demonstrates Humility and Trust in others Offers Encouragement Responds to conflict Promotes "Good Conflict" Respectfully shares ideas Constructively Addresses Destructive Conflict Manages/Resolves Conflict Effectively Supports a constructive team climate. Actively promotes “good conflict” whereby diverse ideas are respectfully shared & used to create better ideas. Addresses destructive conflict directly and constructively, helping to manage/resolve it in a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness and future effectiveness. In addition to completing tasks in a thorough, comprehensive manner on deadline, proactively helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. Offers alternative solutions or courses of action that build on the ideas of others. Helps the team move forward by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals. Helps move team forward by respectfully holding other team members accountable. Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others; notices when someone is not participating and invites him or her to engage. PART 2: EVALUATION OF TEAMWORK, LEADERSHIP & INTERPERSONAL SKILLS Complete the following rubric by rating yourself for each KPI (key performance indicator) on a scale of 1-3. PLEASE BE HONEST. Grading Guidelines: A = Great teammate. I would like to work with this person again. B = Good teammate. Performance not perfect, but no major issues. C = OK teammate. Did the bare minimum to get by most of the time. D = Difficult teammate. Minimal contributions to work and/ or significant interpersonal issues. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on a scale of 1-3. Teammate name: Comments on Individual Attributes: Contribution to team discussions & meetings Contribution to team Labs Facilitated the contributions of others, shared control (did not dominate) Team Project Score 0-5 Overall assessment of effort and participation Contribution of ideas/ helped solve problems Contribution to developing project concept & goals Contribution to planning process & monitoring progress Contribution to completion of Deliverables and Presentation Work Ethic Score 0-5 Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities Demonstrates leadership skills and abilities Demonstrates followership skills and abilities Level of initiative when things needed to be done Responsiveness to team communications outside of class Level of commitment to the team & the work Total (75 points possible) 0 *Grade: 0.0% Overall Comments: Type Teammate Name Here PART 1: EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO WORK Use the following scale to rate the performance of the individual named above on a scale of 1-5 for each attribute. You MUST provide comments to justify scores in the spaces provided. EITHER for the individual attributes OR for the overall comments. I only require one or the other. You'll almost certainly earn more points with the individual attribute comments. Scores alone are not adequate. Team Assignments Score 0-5 Contribution to presentations & written assignments NO Click on the tabs below to evaluate your teammates. *The score should align approximately with the descriptions on the right. IF YOU HAVE GIVEN A SCORE BELOW 75%, DID YOU/YOUR TEAM ADDRESS THE PROBLEM(S) WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL? PLEASE INDICATE BY HIGHLIGHTING THE APPROPRIATE CELL BELOW: YES KPI Attributes Below (1) Meets (2) Exceeds (3) Contributes to team meetings Proposes solutions to problems Collaborates with Others Listens to Others’ Ideas Respects Other Members Holds Others Accountable Facilitates the contributions of team members Encourages open communication Offers constructive input to refine ideas Synthesizes Others’ Contributions Actively seeks input from everyone Individual contributions outside of team meetings Completes tasks Delivers high quality work Completes Tasks on Time Assists Team Members Shows Commitment to team excellence Actively participates in group communications Offers assistance without micromanaging or nagging Fosters constructive team climate Communicates Politely and Respectfully Has a Positive Attitude Motivates Others Demonstrates Humility and Trust in others Offers Encouragement Responds to conflict Promotes "Good Conflict" Respectfully shares ideas Constructively Addresses Destructive Conflict Manages/Resolves Conflict Effectively Supports a constructive team climate. Actively promotes “good conflict” whereby diverse ideas are respectfully shared & used to create better ideas. Addresses destructive conflict directly and constructively, helping to manage/resolve it in a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness and future effectiveness. In addition to completing tasks in a thorough, comprehensive manner on deadline, proactively helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. Offers alternative solutions or courses of action that build on the ideas of others. Helps the team move forward by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals. Helps move team forward by respectfully holding other team members accountable. Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others; notices when someone is not participating and invites him or her to engage. PART 2: EVALUATION OF TEAMWORK, LEADERSHIP & INTERPERSONAL SKILLS Complete the following rubric by rating yourself for each KPI (key performance indicator) on a scale of 1-3. PLEASE BE HONEST. Grading Guidelines: A = Great teammate. I would like to work with this person again. B = Good teammate. Performance not perfect, but no major issues. C = OK teammate. Did the bare minimum to get by most of the time. D = Difficult teammate. Minimal contributions to work and/ or significant interpersonal issues. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on a scale of 1-3. Teammate name: Comments on Individual Attributes: Contribution to team discussions & meetings Contribution to team Labs Facilitated the contributions of others, shared control (did not dominate) Team Project Score 0-5 Overall assessment of effort and participation Contribution of ideas/ helped solve problems Contribution to developing project concept & goals Contribution to planning process & monitoring progress Contribution to completion of Deliverables and Presentation Work Ethic Score 0-5 Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities Demonstrates leadership skills and abilities Demonstrates followership skills and abilities Level of initiative when things needed to be done Responsiveness to team communications outside of class Level of commitment to the team & the work Total (75 points possible) 0 *Grade: 0.0% Overall Comments: Type Teammate Name Here PART 1: EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO WORK Use the following scale to rate the performance of the individual named above on a scale of 1-5 for each attribute. You MUST provide comments to justify scores in the spaces provided. EITHER for the individual attributes OR for the overall comments. I only require one or the other. You'll almost certainly earn more points with the individual attribute comments. Scores alone are not adequate. Team Assignments Score 0-5 Contribution to presentations & written assignments NO Click on the tabs below to evaluate your teammates. *The score should align approximately with the descriptions on the right. IF YOU HAVE GIVEN A SCORE BELOW 75%, DID YOU/YOUR TEAM ADDRESS THE PROBLEM(S) WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL? PLEASE INDICATE BY HIGHLIGHTING THE APPROPRIATE CELL BELOW: YES KPI Attributes Below (1) Meets (2) Exceeds (3) Contributes to team meetings Proposes solutions to problems Collaborates with Others Listens to Others’ Ideas Respects Other Members Holds Others Accountable Facilitates the contributions of team members Encourages open communication Offers constructive input to refine ideas Synthesizes Others’ Contributions Actively seeks input from everyone Individual contributions outside of team meetings Completes tasks Delivers high quality work Completes Tasks on Time Assists Team Members Shows Commitment to team excellence Actively participates in group communications Offers assistance without micromanaging or nagging Fosters constructive team climate Communicates Politely and Respectfully Has a Positive Attitude Motivates Others Demonstrates Humility and Trust in others Offers Encouragement Responds to conflict Promotes "Good Conflict" Respectfully shares ideas Constructively Addresses Destructive Conflict Manages/Resolves Conflict Effectively Supports a constructive team climate. Actively promotes “good conflict” whereby diverse ideas are respectfully shared & used to create better ideas. Addresses destructive conflict directly and constructively, helping to manage/resolve it in a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness and future effectiveness. In addition to completing tasks in a thorough, comprehensive manner on deadline, proactively helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. Offers alternative solutions or courses of action that build on the ideas of others. Helps the team move forward by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals. Helps move team forward by respectfully holding other team members accountable. Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others; notices when someone is not participating and invites him or her to engage. PART 2: EVALUATION OF TEAMWORK, LEADERSHIP & INTERPERSONAL SKILLS Complete the following rubric by rating yourself for each KPI (key performance indicator) on a scale of 1-3. PLEASE BE HONEST. Grading Guidelines: A = Great teammate. I would like to work with this person again. B = Good teammate. Performance not perfect, but no major issues. C = OK teammate. Did the bare minimum to get by most of the time. D = Difficult teammate. Minimal contributions to work and/ or significant interpersonal issues. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on a scale of 1-3. Teammate name: Comments on Individual Attributes: Contribution to team discussions & meetings Contribution to team Labs Facilitated the contributions of others, shared control (did not dominate) Team Project Score 1-5 Overall assessment of effort and participation Contribution of ideas/ helped solve problems Contribution to developing project concept & goals Contribution to planning process & monitoring progress Contribution to completion of Deliverables and Presentation Work Ethic Score 1-5 Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities Demonstrates leadership skills and abilities Demonstrates followership skills and abilities Level of initiative when things needed to be done Responsiveness to team communications outside of class Level of commitment to the team & the work Total (75 points possible) 0 *Grade: 0.0% Overall Comments: Type Teammate Name Here PART 1: EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO WORK Use the following scale to rate the performance of the individual named above on a scale of 1-5 for each attribute. You MUST provide comments to justify scores in the spaces provided. EITHER for the individual attributes OR for the overall comments. I only require one or the other. You'll almost certainly earn more points with the individual attribute comments. Scores alone are not adequate. Team Assignments Score 0-5 Contribution to presentations & written assignments NO Click on the tabs below to evaluate your teammates. *The score should align approximately with the descriptions on the right. IF YOU HAVE GIVEN A SCORE BELOW 75%, DID YOU/YOUR TEAM ADDRESS THE PROBLEM(S) WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL? PLEASE INDICATE BY HIGHLIGHTING THE APPROPRIATE CELL BELOW: YES KPI Attributes Below (1) Meets (2) Exceeds (3) Contributes to team meetings Proposes solutions to problems Collaborates with Others Listens to Others’ Ideas Respects Other Members Holds Others Accountable Facilitates the contributions of team members Encourages open communication Offers constructive input to refine ideas Synthesizes Others’ Contributions Actively seeks input from everyone Individual contributions outside of team meetings Completes tasks Delivers high quality work Completes Tasks on Time Assists Team Members Shows Commitment to team excellence Actively participates in group communications Offers assistance without micromanaging or nagging Fosters constructive team climate Communicates Politely and Respectfully Has a Positive Attitude Motivates Others Demonstrates Humility and Trust in others Offers Encouragement Responds to conflict Promotes "Good Conflict" Respectfully shares ideas Constructively Addresses Destructive Conflict Supports a constructive team climate. Actively promotes “good conflict” whereby diverse ideas are respectfully shared & used to create better ideas. Addresses destructive conflict directly and constructively, helping to manage/resolve it in a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness In addition to completing tasks in a thorough, comprehensive manner on deadline, proactively helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. Offers alternative solutions or courses of action that build on the ideas of others. Helps the team move forward by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals. Helps move team forward by respectfully holding other team members accountable. Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others; notices when someone is not participating and invites him or her to engage. PART 2: EVALUATION OF TEAMWORK, LEADERSHIP & INTERPERSONAL SKILLS Complete the following rubric by rating yourself for each KPI (key performance indicator) on a scale of 1-3. PLEASE BE HONEST. Manages/Resolves Conflict Effectively a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness and future effectiveness. Grading Guidelines: A = Great teammate. I would like to work with this person again. B = Good teammate. Performance not perfect, but no major issues. C = OK teammate. Did the bare minimum to get by most of the time. D = Difficult teammate. Minimal contributions to work and/ or significant interpersonal issues. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on a scale of 1-3. 0 Teammate name: Comments on Individual Attributes: Contribution to team discussions & meetings Contribution to team Labs Facilitated the contributions of others, shared control (did not dominate) Team Project Score 0-5 Overall assessment of effort and participation Contribution of ideas/ helped solve problems Contribution to developing project concept & goals Contribution to planning process & monitoring progress Contribution to completion of Deliverables and Presentation Work Ethic Score 0-5 Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities Demonstrates leadership skills and abilities Demonstrates followership skills and abilities Level of initiative when things needed to be done Responsiveness to team communications outside of class Level of commitment to the team & the work Total (75 points possible) 0 *Grade: 0.0% Overall Comments: Type Teammate Name Here PART 1: EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO WORK Use the following scale to rate the performance of the individual named above on a scale of 1-5 for each attribute. You MUST provide comments to justify scores in the spaces provided. EITHER for the individual attributes OR for the overall comments. I only require one or the other. You'll almost certainly earn more points with the individual attribute comments. Scores alone are not adequate. Team Assignments Score 0-5 Contribution to presentations & written assignments NO Click on the tabs below to evaluate your teammates. *The score should align approximately with the descriptions on the right. IF YOU HAVE GIVEN A SCORE BELOW 75%, DID YOU/YOUR TEAM ADDRESS THE PROBLEM(S) WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL? PLEASE INDICATE BY HIGHLIGHTING THE APPROPRIATE CELL BELOW: YES KPI Attributes Below (1) Meets (2) Exceeds (3) Contributes to team meetings Proposes solutions to problems Collaborates with Others Listens to Others’ Ideas Respects Other Members Holds Others Accountable Facilitates the contributions of team members Encourages open communication Offers constructive input to refine ideas Synthesizes Others’ Contributions Actively seeks input from everyone Individual contributions outside of team meetings Completes tasks Delivers high quality work Completes Tasks on Time Assists Team Members Shows Commitment to team excellence Actively participates in group communications Offers assistance without micromanaging or nagging Fosters constructive team climate Communicates Politely and Respectfully Has a Positive Attitude Motivates Others Demonstrates Humility and Trust in others Offers Encouragement Responds to conflict Promotes "Good Conflict" Respectfully shares ideas Constructively Addresses Destructive Conflict In addition to completing tasks in a thorough, comprehensive manner on deadline, proactively helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. Offers alternative solutions or courses of action that build on the ideas of others. Helps the team move forward by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals. Helps move team forward by respectfully holding other team members accountable. Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others; notices when someone is not participating and invites him or her to engage. PART 2: EVALUATION OF TEAMWORK, LEADERSHIP & INTERPERSONAL SKILLS Complete the following rubric by rating yourself for each KPI (key performance indicator) on a scale of 1-3. PLEASE BE HONEST. Supports a constructive team climate. Actively promotes “good conflict” whereby diverse ideas are respectfully shared & used to create better ideas. Addresses destructive conflict directly and constructively, helping to manage/resolve it in a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness Manages/Resolves Conflict Effectively a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness and future effectiveness. Grading Guidelines: A = Great teammate. I would like to work with this person again. B = Good teammate. Performance not perfect, but no major issues. C = OK teammate. Did the bare minimum to get by most of the time. D = Difficult teammate. Minimal contributions to work and/ or significant interpersonal issues. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on a scale of 1-3. 0 Teammate name: Comments on Individual Attributes: Contribution to team discussions & meetings Contribution to team Labs Facilitated the contributions of others, shared control (did not dominate) Team Project Score 0-5 Overall assessment of effort and participation Contribution of ideas/ helped solve problems Contribution to developing project concept & goals Contribution to planning process & monitoring progress Contribution to completion of Deliverables and Presentation Work Ethic Score 0-5 Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities Demonstrates leadership skills and abilities Demonstrates followership skills and abilities Level of initiative when things needed to be done Responsiveness to team communications outside of class Level of commitment to the team & the work Total (75 points possible) 0 *Grade: 0.0% Overall Comments: Team Assignments Score 0-5 Contribution to presentations & written assignments Type Teammate Name Here PART 1: EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO WORK Use the following scale to rate the performance of the individual named above on a scale of 1-5 for each attribute. You MUST provide comments to justify scores in the spaces provided. EITHER for the individual attributes OR for the overall comments. I only require one or the other. You'll almost certainly earn more points with the individual attribute comments. Scores alone are not adequate. NO Click on the tabs below to evaluate your teammates. YES *The score should align approximately with the descriptions on the right. IF YOU HAVE GIVEN A SCORE BELOW 75%, DID YOU/YOUR TEAM ADDRESS THE PROBLEM(S) WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL? PLEASE INDICATE BY HIGHLIGHTING THE APPROPRIATE CELL BELOW: KPI Attributes Below (1) Meets (2) Exceeds (3) Contributes to team meetings Proposes solutions to problems Collaborates with Others Listens to Others’ Ideas Respects Other Members Holds Others Accountable Facilitates the contributions of team members Encourages open communication Offers constructive input to refine ideas Synthesizes Others’ Contributions Actively seeks input from everyone Individual contributions outside of team meetings Completes tasks Delivers high quality work Completes Tasks on Time Assists Team Members Shows Commitment to team excellence Actively participates in group communications Offers assistance without micromanaging or nagging Fosters constructive team climate Communicates Politely and Respectfully Has a Positive Attitude Motivates Others Demonstrates Humility and Trust in others Offers Encouragement Responds to conflict Promotes "Good Conflict" Respectfully shares ideas Constructively Addresses Destructive Conflict Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others; notices when someone is not participating and invites him or her to engage. In addition to completing tasks in a thorough, comprehensive manner on deadline, proactively helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. Supports a constructive team climate. Actively promotes “good conflict” whereby diverse ideas are respectfully shared & used to create better ideas. Addresses destructive conflict directly and constructively, helping to manage/resolve it in a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness Offers alternative solutions or courses of action that build on the ideas of others. Helps the team move forward by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals. Helps move team forward by respectfully holding other team members accountable. PART 2: EVALUATION OF TEAMWORK, LEADERSHIP & INTERPERSONAL SKILLS Complete the following rubric by rating yourself for each KPI (key performance indicator) on a scale of 1-3. PLEASE BE HONEST. Manages/Resolves Conflict Effectively a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness and future effectiveness. Grading Guidelines: A = Great teammate. I would like to work with this person again. B = Good teammate. Performance not perfect, but no major issues. C = OK teammate. Did the bare minimum to get by most of the time. D = Difficult teammate. Minimal contributions to work and/ or significant interpersonal issues. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on a scale of 1-3. 0 Letter grade Points Percentage A 1000-935 100-93.5 A- 900-934.99 90 B+ 865 -899.99 86.5 - 89.9 B 835 – 864.99 83.5 B- 800 – 834.99 80 C+ 765 – 799.99 76.5 C 735-764.99 73.5 C- 700-734.99 70 D+ 665-699.99 66.5 D 635-664.99 63.5 D- 600-634.99 60 F 0-599.99 0 1 A 0.995 A 0.99 A 0.985 A 0.98 A 0.975 A 0.97 A 0.965 A 0.96 A 0.955 A 0.95 A 0.945 A 0.94 A 0.935 A 0.93 A- 0.925 A- 0.92 A- 0.915 A- 0.91 A- 0.905 A- 0.9 A- 0.895 B+ 0.89 B+ 0.885 B+ 0.88 B+ 0.875 B+ 0.87 B+ 0.865 B+ 0.86 B 0.855 B 0.85 B 0.845 B 0.84 B 0.835 B 0.83 B- 0.825 B- 0.82 B- 0.815 B- 0.81 B- 0.805 B- 0.8 B- 0.795 C+ 0.79 C+ 0.785 C+ 0.78 C+ 0.775 C+ 0.77 C+ 0.765 C+ 0.76 C 0.755 C 0.75 C 0.745 C 0.74 C 0.735 C 0.73 C- 0.725 C- 0.72 C- 0.715 C- 0.71 C- 0.705 C- 0.7 C- 0.695 D+ 0.69 D+ 0.685 D+ 0.68 D+ 0.675 D+ 0.67 D+ 0.665 D+ 0.66 D 0.655 D 0.65 D 0.645 D 0.64 D 0.635 D 0.63 D- 0.625 D- 0.62 D- 0.615 D- 0.61 D- 0.605 D- 0.6 D- 0.595 F 0.59 F 0.585 F 0.58 F 0.575 F 0.57 F 0.565 F 0.56 F 0.555 F 0.55 F 0.545 F 0.54 F 0.535 F 0.53 F 0.525 F 0.52 F 0.515 F 0.51 F 0.505 F 0.5 F 0.495 F 0.49 F 0.485 F 0.48 F 0.475 F 0.47 F 0.465 F 0.46 F 0.455 F 0.45 F 0.445 F 0.44 F 0.435 F 0.43 F 0.425 F 0.42 F 0.415 F 0.41 F 0.405 F 0.4 F 0.395 F 0.39 F 0.385 F 0.38 F 0.375 F 0.37 F 0.365 F 0.36 F 0.355 F 0.35 F 0.345 F 0.34 F 0.335 F 0.33 F 0.325 F 0.32 F 0.315 F 0.31 F 0.305 F 0.3 F 0.295 F 0.29 F 0.285 F 0.28 F 0.275 F 0.27 F 0.265 F 0.26 F 0.255 F 0.25 F 0.245 F 0.24 F 0.235 F 0.23 F 0.225 F 0.22 F 0.215 F 0.21 F 0.205 F 0.2 F 0.195 F 0.19 F 0.185 F 0.18 F 0.175 F 0.17 F 0.165 F 0.16 F 0.155 F 0.15 F 0.145 F 0.14 F 0.135 F 0.13 F 0.125 F 0.12 F 0.115 F 0.11 F 0.105 F 0.1 F 0.095 F 0.09 F 0.085 F 0.08 F 0.075 F 0.07 F 0.065 F 0.06 F 0.055 F 0.05 F 0.045 F 0.04 F 0.035 F 0.03 F 0.025 F 0.02 F 0.015 F 0.01 F 0.005 F 0 F