Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Module 2 Assignment...
1. Yes. 2. 0.97725, 97.725%. 3. 0.6749. 4. 0.9626, 96.26%. 5. 425.5

Module 2 Assignment: Normal Distribution
Module 2 Assignment: Normal Distribution

1. Yes. 2. 0.97725, 97.725%. 3. 0.6749. 4. 0.9626,

Discussion 3_1654768...
Simply put, a literature review is a comprehensive interpretation of texts that focuses on one exclusive detailed topic. A literature review follows a standard essay format, including an introduction,...

Discussion 3
Discussion 3

Simply put, a literature review is a comprehensive

Week 5 Discussion_16...
To define deviance, there is no substantial answer to that. Any norms which are different from the normal can be considered as deviant on the first go but later it can be widely accepted.

Week 5 Discussion
Week 5 Discussion

To define deviance, there is no substantial answer

Chapter 9-Discussion

Chapter 9-Discussion

Q 1. Discuss the difference between the 4 roles of the observer in field research. Offer an example of a research scenario that would be appropriate for each role. 2. Discuss the various methods that can be used to record observations. Offer an explanation of which method, in your opinion, is most effective and why. Also, which method, in your opinion, is least effective and why.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
• Complete observer: In this the researcher cannot be seen or can neither be noticed by the participants. For example, in public places like coffee shops, office lobbies, airports complete observer would be the only means for collecting data that is required. • Observer as participant: Herein, the researcher is known as well as recognized by the participants in various cases. Also, the participants are aware about the research goals of the observer. While performing this role, there happens some form of interaction with the participants but this communication is completely restricted (Babchuk, 1962).