Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Assignment 7: Continuing the Conversation

Assignment 7: Continuing the Conversation

Q Anthony concluded this video talking about the importance of the FRAME in how works of art are presented. How does this work in music? Please watch the video below of Joshua Bell in the subway, and think about how much we are affected by where we see music, the name of the musician we are listening to, and the amount of money we spend on tickets. In other words, how much of our perception of a musical work is influenced by extra-musical factors? Even if you are listening to a recording in your living room with headphones on, what are the factors impinging on your understanding of the work? All of this raises a rather big philosophical question: Is there any situation in which a work of music or art can be said to exist in a kind of "pure" or most proper or most characteristic or definitive state? And once again, can you find a common thread of link between the reality of Joshua Bell playing in the subway and Rauschenberg's Erased De Kooning? Share your thoughts. Your post should be two to three (well-developed) paragraphs long. Read your classmates' posts and reply to at least one of them.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

Both of these artworks reemphasize the idea of perception in art. Just like Kooning who erased a piece of art to make another one, performing music in subway I a matter of choice. Art allows people to express by giving freedom of expression to them and when art has been contained with several boundaries, it loses its core meaning which is to make sure that people are expressing their thoughts through art that they cannot express through words. Aesthetics have become an integral part of art along with ethics and morals but at the same time, these concepts tend to limit freedom of the artists